WILLIAMS v. JONES
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re; 21 Report and Recommendation, ; granting 12 Motion to Dismiss. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely filed. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by William Terrell Hodges on 4/13/17. (bkp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
KURTIS M WILLIAMS,
Case No. 1:16-cv-00133-WTH-EMT
JULIE L JONES,
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation dated March 13, 2017. (Doc. 21). The parties have been furnished a
copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file
objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Petitioner
moved for an extension of time to file objections, Doc. 22, but before the Court could
act on the motion, Petitioner timely filed objections at Doc. 23. Accordingly, the motion
for an extension of time is denied as moot. I have made a de novo review of the Report
and Recommendation based on those objections. Having considered the Report and
Recommendation, and the timely filed objections, I have determined that the Report
and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Doc. 21, is adopted
and incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2
Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time to file objections, Doc. 22, is
DENIED as moot.
The clerk is directed to enter the following judgment: “Respondent’s Motion
to Dismiss, Doc. 12, is GRANTED. Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas
corpus, Doc. 1, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely filed. A
certificate of appealability is DENIED.”
The clerk is directed to close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DONE and ORDERED at Gainesville, Florida this 13th day of April, 2017.
Case No: 1:16‐cv‐00133‐WTH‐EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?