SCOTT v.BERRYHILL

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 23 Report and Recommendation, granting 22 Motion to Remand. The Commissioner's decision denying benefits to Plaintiff is REVERSED and REMANDED. Signed by William Terrell Hodges on 5/15/17. (bkp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION CAMERON C SCOTT, PLAINTIFF, -vs- Case No. 1:16-cv-00227-WTH-GRJ NANCY A BERRYHILL, DEFENDANT. ______________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 23, 2017. (Doc. 23). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Doc. 23, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The clerk is directed to enter the following judgment: “Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Remand Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Doc. 22, is GRANTED.     Page 2 of 2  3. The Commissioner’s decision denying benefits to Plaintiff is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. On remand, the ALJ will evaluate whether Plaintiff’s impairments meet or equal a listing, including Listing 12.05, and issue a new decision.” 4. The clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. DONE and ORDERED at Gainesville, Florida this 15th day of May, 2017.         Case No: 1:16‐cv‐00227‐WTH‐GRJ   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?