Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and granting 15 Motion to Remand filed by CAROLYN W COLVIN signed by William Terrell Hodges on 6/23/17. The clerk is directed to enter the following judgment, terminated any pending motions and close file. (tss)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION JOHN FRANCIS KRUSE, JR, PLAINTIFF, -vs- Case No. 1:16-cv-00329-WTH-GRJ CAROLYN W COLVIN, DEFENDANT. ______________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 26, 2017. (Doc. 16). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. 2. Defendant’s Motion for Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), ECF No. 15, is GRANTED. 3.     The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Doc. 16, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. The clerk is directed to enter the following judgment: “The Commissioner’s decision denying benefits to Plaintiff is REVERSED and REMANDED Page 2 of 2  pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. On remand the ALJ will consider the medical opinion evidence in accordance with the Commissioner’s regulations, if warranted, consult a vocational expert to clarify the effects of the assessed limitations on Plaintiff’s ability to perform work, and issue a new decision.” 4. The clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. DONE and ORDERED at Gainesville, Florida this 23rd day of June, 2017.         Case No: 1:16‐cv‐00329‐WTH‐GRJ   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?