HOFFMAN v. JONES, et al

Filing 40

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 2/26/2019. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Defendants' motions to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted are GRANTED. ECF Nos. 19 , 20 , 22 , and 23 ." The Clerk shall close the file. (kdm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION GERALD RAY HOFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:17cv302-MW/GRJ DR. ASBELTI LLORENS, et al., Defendants. ___________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 39. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s opinion. This Court, as it must, accepts Plaintiff’s allegations as true. However, the fact that Dr. Llorens allegedly displayed a “bad attitude” etc. does not alter the fact that Plaintiff also alleges that Dr. Llorens repeatedly saw him and treated him. In fact, Plaintiff alleges that Dr. Llorens ordered numerous diagnostic tests and continued to try different medications. Plaintiff suggests that Dr. Llorens got it wrong. The fact that Dr. Llorens got it wrong, without more, does not support a claim of deliberate indifference. Plaintiff does not allege that Dr. Llorens intentionally let him suffer or ignored his complaints. In order to state a claim against Dr. LLorens, Plaintiff has to allege more than Dr. Llorens negligently treated his skin condition. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Defendants’ motions to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which 1 relief may be granted are GRANTED. ECF Nos. 19, 20, 22, and 23.” The Clerk shall close the file. SO ORDERED on February 26, 2019. s/Mark E. Walker ____ Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?