BROOKS v. HILL et al

Filing 44

ORDER ACCEPTING 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying 43 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 11/6/2018. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Defendants' Motion to Dismis s, ECF No. 28 , is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint, ECF No. 1 is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing the complaint. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 43 , is DENIED." The Clerk shall close the file. (kdm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION
CLIFTON McNEIL BROOKS, SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 1:18cv43-MW/GRJ

J. C. HILL and
ERIK LANCASTER,
Defendants.
_________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, ECF No. 39, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections to the report
and recommendation, ECF No. 42. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff’s objections, as
this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF
No. 28, is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s complaint, ECF No. 1 is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies prior to filing the complaint. Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of
counsel, ECF No. 43, is DENIED.” The Clerk shall close the file.
SO ORDERED on November 6, 2018.
s/Mark E. Walker
____
Chief United States District Judge