VAZQUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Filing 26

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION signed by CHIEF JUDGE MARK E WALKER on 1/22/19. The Commissioners Unopposed 24 Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand of the Cause to the Commissioner is GRANTED, and the Commissioners decision denying benefits is REVERSED. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to administratively close the file. (tss)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION LINDA BRENDA VAZQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:18cv97-MW/MJF COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ___________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 25. Defendant has certified Plaintiff has no objection to its Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment With Remand. ECF No. 24. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating: 1. The Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand of the Cause to the Commissioner, ECF No. 24, is GRANTED, and the Commissioner’s decision denying benefits is REVERSED. 2. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 3. The Defendant is ordered to conduct proceedings in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. 1 4. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to administratively close the file. SO ORDERED on January 22, 2019. s/ MARK E. WALKER Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?