LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. MOULTON PROPERTIES INC et al

Filing 476

ORDER - GRANTED 473 Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to 460 Revised Motion in Limine, to the extent that 1) they shall have until January 9, 2009, in which to respond to the motion and 2) the page limit for the response is increased to 40 pages. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 12/15/2008. (Response to motion due by by 1/9/2009.) (djb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE N O R T H E R N DISTRICT OF FLORIDA P E N S A C O L A DIVISION L A N D M A R K AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintif f/Co unter- De fend ant, A R C H INSURANCE GROUP, Interv enor /Plaintif f/Co unter- De fend ant, v. M OU LT ON PROPERTIES, INC., M O U L T O N BROTHERS, INC., and TH E M OU LT ON TRUST,, D e f e n d a n t / C o u n t e r - P l a i n ti f f s , _______________________________/ ORDER Case No. 3:05cv401/LAC T h e Emergency Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ... (Doc. 4 7 3 ) filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Landmark American Insurance Company ( " L a n d m a r k " ) and the Intervener/Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Arch Specialty Insurance C o m p a n y ("Arch") is GRANTED to the extent that 1) they shall have until January 9, 2009, in which to respond to the motion and 2) the page limit for the response is increased to 40 pages. Counsel are reminded that the purpose of the response is to respond to D e f e n d a n t / C o u n t er - P l ai n t if f s' assertions that various evidentiary materials are inadmissable. The response is not a forum to reply to movants' factual objections to their statements of m a t e r ia l facts based on disputes over their accuracy, credibility and the like. O R D E R E D on this 15th day of December, 2008. s/L.A. Collier Lacey A. Collier S e n i o r United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?