HEBERT v. OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER

Filing 4

ORDER

  1. Clerk to send Petitioner an application to proceed in forma pauperis.
  2. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from docketing date of this order, petitioner shall either pay the filing fee ($5.00) or submit fully compl eted application to proceed in forma pauperis.
  3. Failure to comply will result in recommendation of dismissal.
  • FILING Fee due by 5/18/2007, Alternatively, IFP Motion due by 5/18/2007.
    Signed by Judge ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on April 17, 2007.

    (cc: Hebert w/IFP form)
    (cbj)

    HEBERT v. OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER Doc. 4 Case 3:07-cv-00158-LC-EMT Document 4 Filed 04/17/2007 Page 1 of 1 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION LARRY WAYNE HEBERT, Petitioner, vs. OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER, Respondent. _____________________________/ ORDER This cause is before the court upon Petitioner's filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The court notes that Petitioner has neither applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid the filing fee. Before this matter may proceed, Petitioner must either pay the filing fee or obtain leave to proceed in forma pauperis by filing a fully and properly completed application and attachments. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. 2. pauperis. 3. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action for failure to comply with an order of the court. DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of April 2007. The clerk is directed to send to Petitioner an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Petitioner shall Case No. 3:07cv158/LAC/EMT either pay the filing fee of $5.00 or submit a fully completed application to proceed in forma /s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
  • Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


    Why Is My Information Online?