HARRELL v. ASTRUE
Filing
24
ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs 18 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs Under the Equal Access to Justice Act is GRANTED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 2/4/2009. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION WILLAR D J. HARRELL, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Co mm is si on er of Social Security, Defendant. ___________________________________/ Case No.: 3:08cv66/LAC/EMT
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated January 5, 2009 (Doc. 21). The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed, if any. Having considered the report and recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 18) is GRANTED as follows: Plaintiff's counsel, Nick A. Ortiz, Esquire, is entitled to recover expenses and fees in the amount of $3,133.40, for representing Plaintiff before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA); the amount of attorney fees and hourly rates requested under the EAJA are reasonable; and the Commissioner is directed to pay counsel that amount. Filing fee costs in the amount of $350.00 are also awarded, to be paid from the Judgment Fund
Page 2 of 2
of the United States Treasury. DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of February, 2009.
s /L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:08cv66/LAC/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?