LOWERY et al vs. CASH'S CABANAS INC et al

Filing 149

ORDER - It is ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (doc. 148 ) is GRANTED. Upon reconsideration, the court finds defendant's attorney fee records at document entries 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , [119 ], 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , and 131 are timely filed. The clerk is directed to edit the affected docket entry notations accordingly. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 10/2/2009. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION BRENDA LOWERY, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. CASH'S CABANAS, INC., et al., Defendants. / ORDER This matter is before the court on defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of the court's order of September 28, 2009. (Doc. 148). Upon review, the court notes that although this case was filed with the court on May 7, 2008, the Initial Scheduling Order was not entered until June 16, 2009, due to activity on various motions and class certification matters. This unusual procedural delay was not taken into account when the court considered plaintiff's Notice of Objection. In further consideration, though defendant's attorney fee records were not filed consistent with the requirements of Local Rule 54.1(b)(2), the records were filed in accordance with the provisions of the court's Initial Scheduling Order. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (doc. 148) is GRANTED. Upon reconsideration, the court finds defendant's attorney fee records at document entries 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, and 131 are timely filed. The clerk is directed to edit the affected docket entry notations accordingly. DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of October, 2009. CASE NO.: 3:08cv186/MCR/EMT s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?