WATKINS v. ASTRUE

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - re 31 . - - Pla's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs 27 is Granted as outlined in order (see image). - - - Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on January 20, 2010. (cbj)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION MILTON R. WATKINS, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated December 17, 2009 (Doc. 31). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Plaintiff's Motion For Attorney Fees and Costs (Doc. 27) is GRANTED as follows: Plaintiff's counsel, Byron A. Lassiter, Esquire, is entitled to recover fees and expenses in the amount of $3,233.90 for representing Plaintiff before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA); the amount of attorney fees and hourly rates requested under the EAJA are reasonable; and the Commissioner is directed to pay counsel that amount. Costs in the amount of $350.00 are also awarded, to be paid from the Judgment Fund of the United States Treasury. DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of January 2010. /s/ Roger Vinson ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No.: 3:08cv255/RV/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?