HALE v. POTTER

Filing 38

ORDER ADOPTING 37 Report and Recommendation. - - This case is Dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to the court's inherent authority and Fed.R.Civ.P.41(b), for Plaintiff TERRY L HALE's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the court's orders. - - Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on May 11, 2010. (cbj)

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION TERRY L. HALE, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN E. POTTER, Defendant. ______________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated April 2, 2010 (Doc. 37). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and Case No. 3:08cv324/MCR/EMT

incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED, with prejudice, pursuant to the court's inherent

authority and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), for Plaintiff Terry L. Hale's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the court's orders. DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of May, 2010.

s/

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE