CITY OF VALPARAISO v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

Filing 18

ORDER - Defendant's 9 MOTION to Dismiss is DENIED. - - The stay of this case entered 1/20/2009 is LIFTED. The 10 Scheduling Order entered 12/17/2009, is VACATED, and no revised scheduling order shall be entered. - - Defendant shall file answer to amended complaint within thirty (30) days of order date. Dispositive motions shall be filed within thirty (30) days of the filing of the defendants answer. Upon the filing of motions for summary judgment, the court will enter an order informing the parties that the motions will be taken under advisement fourteen (14) days after their filing. See N.D.Fla.Loc.R. 56.1(B). UNITED STATES AIR FORCE Answer due by 5/17/2009. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on April 17, 2009. (cbj)

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

CITY OF VALPARAISO, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Defendant. _____________________________/ Case No. 3:08cv420/MCR

ORDER Oral argument was heard this date on the defendant's motion to dismiss. (Doc. 9). As announced by the court during the proceeding, the motion is DENIED. The stay of this case entered January 20, 2009, is LIFTED. The scheduling order entered December 17, 2009, is vacated, and no revised scheduling order shall be entered. The defendant shall file an answer to the amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Dispositive motions shall be filed within thirty (30) days of the filing of the defendant's answer. Upon the filing of motions for summary judgment, the court will enter an order informing the parties that the motions will be taken under advisement fourteen (14) days after their filing. See N.D.Fla.Loc.R. 56.1(B). DONE and ORDERED this 17th day of April, 2009.

s/

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE