NELSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Filing
31
ORDER - re Plaintiff's Reply To United States' Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment (received 8/24/2009) - The document shall be returned w/o filing. May resubmit after noted deficiency is corrected. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on August 25, 2009. (doc returned to plaintiff) (cbj)
<![CDATA[
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION DAVID NELSON vs UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case No. 3:08cv508/MCR/EMT
ORDER PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO UNITED STATES' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (received by the clerk of the court on August 24, 2009), was referred to the undersigned with the following deficiency: Pursuant to Rule 7.1(C)(2) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of Florida, no reply memoranda may be filed absent a showing of good cause and upon leave of the court. For this reason, it is ORDERED that: The submitted hard copy of the document shall be returned to Plaintiff by the Clerk without electronic filing. It may be resubmitted after the above-noted deficiency is corrected. DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of August 2009.
/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
