COOKE v. ADVANCED FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING the magistrate judge's 28 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and plaintiff's second amended complaint is dismissed. This dismissal is without prejudice to plain tiff's filing, within twenty days, of a third amended complaint that corrects the legal deficiencies identified by the defendant in its motion. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 7/23/2009. (Third Amended Complaint due by 8/24/2009.) (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION KISMET COOKE, Plaintiff, vs. ADVANCED FIRE PROTECTION, Defendant. / ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated June 23, 2009. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. 2. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and Defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. 16) is GRANTED and plaintiff's incorporated by reference in this order. second amended complaint is dismissed. CASE NO.: 3:08cv527/MCR/MD Page 2 of 2 3. This dismissal is without prejudice to plaintiff's filing, within twenty days, of a third amended complaint that corrects the legal deficiencies identified by the defendant in its motion. DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of July, 2009. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No.: 3:08cv527/MCR/MD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?