HAMEL-SCHWULTZ v. NEGROTTO

Filing 131

ORDER denying 130 Response filed by MARY HAMEL-SCHWULST. On consideration of plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's order the court concludes the magistrate judge's order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to the law. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's order is Affirmed. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 11/5/09. (lcu)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT N O R T H E R N DISTRICT OF FLORIDA P E N S AC O L A DIVISION
MARY HAMEL-SCHWULST VS JEFFEREY P. NEGROTTO, ET AL REFERRAL AND ORDER Referred to Judge Rodgers on 11/03/2009 Type of Motion/Pleading OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE, ELIZABETH TIMOTHY'S RULING OF OCTOBER 26, 2009, RE: THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT APPEAL TO THE DISTRICT COURT, TITLE 28:636 U.S.C., LOCAL RULE 72.1 Filed by: Plaintiff on 11/2/09 Doc. No. 130 ( ) Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading RESPONSES: on Doc. No. on Doc. No. WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT /s/ Lynn C. Uhl Deputy Clerk: Lynn Uhl CASE NO. 3:08cv529 MCR/EMT

ORDER
Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 5th day of November, 2009, that: The requested relief is DENIED. On consideration of plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's order the court concludes the magistrate judge's order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to the law. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's order is Affirmed.

s/

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Entered On Docket: Copies sent to:

By:

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Document No.