MURPHY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Filing 68

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 63 Report and Recommendation. The third amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 40 ), challenging the convictions and sentences in State of Florida v. Lance Steri Murphy in the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Florida, case number 06-0309 is DENIED, and the clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 1/4/2012. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION LANCE MURPHY, Petitioner, vs. Case No. 3:09cv78/LAC/CJK ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent ________________________________________________________________ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated September 26, 2011. (Doc. 63). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The third amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 40), challenging the convictions and sentences in State of Florida v. Lance Steri Murphy Page 2 of 2 in the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Florida, case number 06-0309 is DENIED, and the clerk is directed to close the file. 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of January, 2012. s /L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:09v78/LAC/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?