SUNTRUST BANK v. O'BRIEN
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - re 10 Report and Recommendation; Defendant's 7 "Motion to Dismess [sic] Under Rule 12(B) for Lack of Jurisdiction, Improper Venue, Insuffecient [sic] Service of Process, or Failure to State a Claim" is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on May 18, 2009.(cc: O'Brien) (cbj)
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION SUNTRUST BANK, Plaintiff, vs. NANCY RENEE O'BRIEN, Defendant. ____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated April 15, 2009 (Doc. 10). The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections. Having considered the report and recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Defendant's "Motion to Dismess [sic] Under Rule 12(B) for Lack of Jurisdiction, Improper Venue, Insuffecient [sic] Service of Process, or Failure to State a Claim" (Doc. 7) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2009. Case No. 3:09cv85/RV/EMT
/s/
Roger Vinson
ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?