STROBO v. COX ENTERPRISES INC

Filing 16

Conditional Transfer ORDER signed by Jeffery N. Luthi, Clerk of the Panel (certified copy) received via email 7/16/09 from Clerk, Western District of Oklahoma (Oklahoma City), MDL No. 2048 (lcu)

A CERTIFIED "TRUE GOQY
ATTEST
By Denise Morgan-Stone on Jut 14, 2009

FILED
JUL 1 5 2009

I

U.S. DIST. COURT,

ROBERT D. ULNI~IS, CLEHX DIST. OF OKLA , DEPUTY

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON IMULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Jun 26,2009

UNITED STATE

U ICIAL PANEL

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: COX ENTERPRISES, INC., SET-TOP CABLE TELEVISION BOX ANTITRUST LITIGATION

CLERK'S OFFICE

MDL No. 2048

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1)

On June 1 1,2009, the Panel transferred four civil actions to the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5 1407. See F . S u p p . 2 d (J.P.M.L. 2009). With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Robin J. Cauthron. It appears that the actions on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Western District of Oklahoma and assigned to Judge Cauthron. Pursuant to Rule 7.4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), these actions are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 5 1407 to the Western District of Oklahoma for the reasons stated in the order of June 1 1,2009, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Robin J. Cauthron. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The transmittal ofthis order to said Clerk shall be stayed 15 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 15-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

1-

Inasmuch as no objection is pend~ng this time, the at stay is lifted.

FOR THE PANEL:

CLERK'S OFFICE
UNII kD STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ClaV P.33LTllliSTRl1r"r LITIGATION

klerk!of<he Panel
' J E S T A truechgpy of the o r i m

IN RE: COX ENTERPRISES, INC., SET-TOP CABLE TELEVISION BOX ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL No. 2048

SCHEDULE CTO-1- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS DIST. DIV. -- C.A. # CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 8 09-441

CASE CAPTION

John Joseph Brady, et al. v. CoxCom, Inc.

CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CAS 3 09-1045 Sharon Coughlin v. Cox Communications, Inc., et al. FLORIDA NORTHERN FLN 3 09-103 LOUISIANA EASTERN LAE 2 09-3065 LAE 2 09-3079 LAE 2 09-3137 LAE 2 09-3155 LAE 2 09-3170 LAE 2 09-3264 LAE 2 09-3354 LAE 2 09-3624 LAE 2 09-3625 NEVADA NV 2 09-614

Ron Strobo v. Cox Enterprises, Inc., et al. Barksdale Hortenstine v. CoxCom, Inc. Danielle Smith v. Cox Enterprises, Inc., et al. Toni Becnel v. Cox Enterprises, Inc., et al. Robert M. Becnel v. Cox Enterprises, Inc., et al. Brandy Zayas v. Cox Enterprises, Inc., et al. David Abdullah v. CoxCom, Inc. Carl Indest v. Cox Enterprises, Inc., et al. Erica Martin v. Cox Enterprises, Inc., et al. Paulette Zibilich v. Cox Enterprises, Inc., et al.

Sandra Prezgay v. Cox Communications, Inc., et al.