BESSMAN v. TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

Filing 21

ORDER denying as moot 16 Motion to Compel (the motion having been withdrawn 20 ). Within ten (10) days the plaintiffs shall pay $1000.00 to defendant as a sanction for that party's costs in defending the instant motio n to compel. Either party may within ten days seek reconsideration of the sanction or the amount by filing a motion to reconsider with brief argument and supporting documentation, in which case the requirement for payment will be stayed until the matter is resolved. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on 7/24/09. (lcu)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT N O R T H E R N DISTRICT OF FLORIDA P E N S AC O L A DIVISION PAUL M. BESSMAN, ET AL VS TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA REFERRAL AND ORDER Referred to Judge Davis on 07/17/2009 Type of Motion/Pleading MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FROM DEFENDANT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY Filed by: Plaintiffs on 7/17/09 Doc. No. 16 ( ) Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading RESPONSES: DEFENDANT on 7/23/09 Doc. No. 18 on Doc. No. WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT /s/ Lynn C. Uhl Deputy Clerk: Lynn Uhl CASE NO. 3:09cv123 MCR/MD ORDER Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 24t h day of July, 2009, that: (a) The requested relief is DENIED as moot, the motion having been withdrawn (doc. 20). Within ten (10) days the plaintiffs shall pay $1000.00 to (b) defendant as a sanction for that party's costs in defending the instant motion to compel. Either party may within ten days seek reconsideration of the sanction or the amount by filing a motion to reconsider with brief argument and supporting documentation, in which case the requirement for payment will be stayed until the matter is resolved. /s/ Entered On Docket: Copies sent to: By: Miles Davis MILES DAVIS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP Document No.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?