EDLER v. MCNEIL
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus, and 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by CURLEY ANTONIO EDLER: It is recommended - That this cause be dismissed without prejudice so that plain tiff may file his petition in the intended forum. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 6/1/2009. R&R flag set. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on May 4, 2009.(cc: Edler) (cbj)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION CURLEY ANTONIO EDLER, Plaintiff, vs. WALT ER A. MCNEIL, Defendants. 3:09cv185/LAC/MD
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This cause is before the court on plaintiff's petition for writ of mandamus and motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 1, 2). Both of these pleadings were captioned for the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Santa Rosa County, and plaintiff cites Florida law as the basis for jurisdiction over his mandamus petition. Clearly, the pleadings were sent to the incorrect court, either by plaintiff or by someone else on his behalf. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED: That this cause be dismissed without prejudice so that plaintiff may file his petition in the intended forum. At Pensacola, Florida, this 4th day of May, 2009.
MILES DAVIS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within ten days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).
Case No: 3:09cv185/LAC/MD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?