Jackson v. Astrue

Filing 34

ORDER ADOPTING the magistrate judge's 33 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's counsel is entitled to recover a reasonable fee for the handling of this case in the United States District Court for the Northern Distric t of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA). A reasonable fee for this case under the EAJA is $5,632.58 and the Commissioner shall pay plaintiff $5,632.58 in care of his attorney. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 6/10/2010. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION PHILLIP DWAYNE JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. / ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated May 11, 2010. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and CASE NO.: 3:09cv218/MCR/MD incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Plaintiff's counsel is entitled to recover a reasonable fee for the handling of this case in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA). 3. A reasonable fee for this case under the EAJA is $5,632.58 and the Commissioner shall pay plaintiff $5,632.58 in care of his attorney. DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of June, 2010. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?