O'CONNOR v. CARNAHAN

Filing 25

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended That this case be Dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with an order of the court and for want of prosecution. - - R&R flag set - - - (Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 2/16/2010. ) - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on January 19, 2010. (cbj)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NYKA O'CONNOR, Plaintiff, vs. M. L. CARNAHAN, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION By order dated November 20, 2009, the court gave Plaintiff through January 4, 2010, in which to file a notice with the court advising of his continued interest in pursuing this litigation (Doc. 20). The court advised Plaintiff that if he failed to file a notice as directed within the time allotted it would assume he wished to abandon this case. The court further informed Plaintiff that if he failed to timely file the notice as directed it would recommend dismissal of this action to the district court without further notice to Plaintiff. The court repeated this information to Plaintiff in its order dated December 18, 2009 (Doc. 22), adding that a notice that was non-responsive to the court's November 20, 2009, order (such as Plaintiff's notice filed December 16, 2009 (Doc. 21)) would likewise result in a recommendation of dismissal for failure to comply with an order of the court. The time for Plaintiff to file a notice advising of his continued interest in pursuing this litigation has now elapsed with no response from Plaintiff. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED: That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with an order of the court and for want of prosecution. At Pensacola, Florida, this 19th day of January 2010. Case No. 3:09cv224/WS/EMT /s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 2 of 2 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988). Case No. 3:09cv224/WS/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?