O'CONNOR v. CARNAHAN

Filing 33

ORDER re 7 Amended Complaint, filed by NYKA O'CONNOR - - Clerk to forward complaint form to pla (42:1983pr) with this case number written on it. - Clerk shall also forward to Pla a copy of court's Order (doc 16 ). - Pla shall have thirty (30) days to file Second Amended Complaint. - - (Amended Pleadings due by 11/8/2010. ) - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on October 8, 2010.- - (1983 form & doc 16 to pla) (cbj)

Download PDF
-EMT O'CONNOR v. CARNAHAN Doc. 33 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NYKA O'CONNOR, Plaintiff, vs. M. L. CARNAHAN, et al., Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). The filing fee has been paid in full (Doc. 5). On November 3, 2009, the court entered an order giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to file an amended complaint (Doc. 16). Upon Plaintiff's request, the court agreed to hold the matter in abeyance until January 4, 2010, by which date he was directed he must also file a notice advising the court of his continued interest in pursuing this litigation (Doc. 20). Plaintiff was advised that if he failed to respond as instructed within the time allotted, the court would assume he wished to abandon this case and thus would recommend dismissal of this action to the district court without further notice to Plaintiff. The court repeated this information to Plaintiff in its order dated December 18, 2009 (Doc. 22). When the time for Plaintiff to file a notice advising of his continued interest in pursuing this litigation elapsed with no response from Plaintiff, the court recommended dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to comply with an order of the court and for want of prosecution (Doc. 25). On February 11, 2010, the district court adopted the recommendation (Doc. 26); the clerk entered judgment and closed the case (Doc. 27). On July 26, 2010, however, the district court granted Plaintiff's motion to set aside the order of dismissal and vacate judgment, in light of Plaintiff's representations that from October 2009 until March of 2010 Case No. 3:09cv224/WS/EMT Dockets.Justia.com Page 2 of 2 he was mentally unstable, had no access to his legal materials or other property, and did not learn until June 11, 2010, that his lawsuit had been dismissed (Doc. 29). The district court also directed the clerk to return the file to the undersigned for further proceedings. To date, Plaintiff has not complied with the court's November 3, 2009, order directing him to file an amended complaint (Doc. 16). Plaintiff therefore shall be required to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. 2. 3. The clerk of court is directed to forward to Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form for For Plaintiff's convenience, the clerk shall also forward to Plaintiff a copy of the Plaintiff shall have THIRTY (30) DAYS in which to file an amended civil rights use in actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case number should be written on the form. court's November 3, 2009, order which contains instructions for amendment. complaint, which shall be typed or clearly written, submitted on the court form, and marked "Second Amended Complaint." 4. Plaintiff's failure to submit an amended complaint as instructed will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action. DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of October 2010. /s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case No. 3:09cv224/WS/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?