O'CONNOR v. CARNAHAN

Filing 406

ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 403 ) is DENIED, and he is directed to pay the full appellate filing fee of $505.00 within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 4/6/2017. (kjw) (Fee due by 5/8/2017.)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NYKA O’CONNOR, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 3:09cv224/WS/EMT M.L. CARNAHAN, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER Plaintiff was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in this civil rights action in this district court. The action was dismissed as to all claims, and final judgment was entered on March 17, 2017 (see ECF No. 400). Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal (ECF No. 402) and now seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 403). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a), this court hereby certifies that this appeal is not taken in good faith, and Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The reasons for this court’s decision are outlined in the Magistrate Judge’s Reports and Recommendations dated November 18, 2013 (ECF No. 173), September 21, 2015 (ECF No. 379), and November 15, 2016 (ECF No. 392), and by this court’s orders dated January 27, 2014 (ECF No. 183), October 21, 2015 (ECF No. 383), and March 17, 2017 (ECF No. 400) which adopted Page 2 of 2 and incorporated those recommendations. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 403) is DENIED, and he is directed to pay the full appellate filing fee of $505.00 within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order. DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of April 2017. s/ William Stafford WILLIAM STAFFORD SENIOR CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No.: 3:09cv224/WS/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?