SMITH v. BRUSTER
ORDER ADOPTING 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1) This case is dismissed without prejudice due to plas' submission of documents bearing falsified signatures to the court. 2) All pending motions are denied as moot. 3) If Plas' choose to initiate another case based upon the same or similar facts/issues, whether jointly or individually, they are precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis in such case. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 4/5/2010. (laj)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION EUGENE SMITH, SHAMEKA BROOKS, Plaintiffs, vs. REGINALD BRUSTER, et al., Defendants. CASE NO.: 3:09cv271/LAC/MD
ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated March 3, 2010. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiffs' submission
of documents bearing falsified signatures to the court. 3. All pending motions are denied as moot.
Page 2 of 2
If plaintiffs choose to initiate another case based upon the same or
similar facts/issues, whether jointly or individually, they are precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis in such case. DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of April, 2010.
s /L .A . Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:09cv271/LAC/MD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?