SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; adopting re 40 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's attempts to amend his habeas petition to add the claims asserted in his Reply (doc. 25 ) and his Proposed Second Amended Petition (s ee doc. 33 , attachment) are DENIED as futile, since they are time barred. Petitioners First Amended Petition (doc. 7 ) is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 2/25/2011. (djb)
-EMT SMITH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION TERRY D. SMITH, Petitioner, v. EDWIN G. BUSS, Respondent. _____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 4, 2011. (Doc. 40). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and Case No. 3:09cv278/MCR/EMT
incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Petitioner's attempts to amend his habeas petition to add the claims asserted
in his Reply (doc. 25) and his Proposed Second Amended Petition (see doc. 33, attachment) are DENIED as futile, since they are time barred. 3. 4 5. Petitioner's First Amended Petition (doc. 7) is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2011. s/
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?