MILLS v. INNOVATIVE ENERGY GLOBAL LTD

Filing 13

ORDER re 10 MOTION to Remand, 11 Memorandum in Support of Motion filed by KEVIN J MILLS - The documents shall remain in the electronic file, but the court will not consider them until you have corrected the noted deficiencies through the filing of corrected documents. The document is denied without prejudice with leave given to refile after correction. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on July 31, 2009. (cbj)

Download PDF
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION KEVIN J. MILLS vs INNOVATIVE ENERGY GLOBAL LTD Case No. 3:09cv294-MCR/MD ORDER PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO REMAND and ...MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO REMAND, (electronically filed 7/30/2009, docs. 10,11), were referred to the undersigned with the following deficiencies: Counsel for the moving party shall confer with counsel for the opposing party and shall file with the court, at the time of filing a motion, a statement certifying that counsel has conferred with counsel for the opposing party in a good-faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues raised or has attempted to so confer but, for good cause stated, was unsuccessful, as required by N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(B). For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that: The document shall remain in the electronic file, but the court will not consider it until you have corrected the above deficiencies through the filing of a corrected document. The document is denied without prejudice with leave given to refile after correction. DONE and ORDERED this 31st day of July, 2009. /s M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?