HAN v. NICOLE MCDONALD AGENCY

Filing 45

ORDER ADOPTING 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants' motion to dismiss 24 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. This case is DISMISSED and the clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 3/15/10. (lcu)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION JUNG BEA HAN, Plaintiff, vs. NICOLE McDONALD and W. RICHARD FANCHER, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 2, 2010 (Doc. 41). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 24) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 4. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. Case No.: 3:09cv295/LAC/EMT Page 2 of 2 5. This case is DISMISSED and the clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of March, 2010. s /L .A . Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:09cv295/LAC/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?