LEVITAN v. MARY ANN PATTI LLC

Filing 178

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - (1) Adopting 169 Report and Recommendation. (2) Denying as moot 97 Motion to Dismiss. (3) Denying as moot 99 Motion to Dismiss. (4) Granting 144 Motion to Amend/Correct. (5) Dismissing s ua sponte 146 Fourth Amended Complaint. Said dismissals are with prejudice as to COunts I, II, V, VI, VII and without prejudice as to Counts III, IV, VIII, and IX. (7) Denying as moot 147 Motion for Joinder. (8) The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 3/31/2011. (sps)

Download PDF
-CJK LEVITAN et al v MARY ANN PATTI LLC et al Doc. 178 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION DANIEL J. LEVITAN and PAMELA H. LEVITAN, Plaintiffs, v. MARY ANN PATTI, MARY ANN PATTI, LLC, MAP TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC, KEITH P. GUTHRIE, RAM 2000 CONTRACTORS, INC., DAVID MORGAN, JOHN SMITH, CASEY CONN, MIKE AMERSON, OLIVER JERRY GULSBY, and JOHN DOES, 1-10, Defendants. / ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated February 8, 2011. (Doc. 169). The plaintiffs have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and CASE NO.: 3:09cv321/MCR/MD incorporated by reference in this order. Dockets.Justia.com Page 2 of 2 2. Defendants M.A.P. Title Insurance Agency, LLC, Mary Ann Patti, LLC, and Mary Ann Patti's motion to dismiss the third amended complaint (doc. 97) is DENIED as moot. 3. Defendants Keith Guthrie, Ram 2000 Contractors, Inc., and Scenic View Properties, LLC's motion to dismiss the third amended complaint (doc. 99) is DENIED as moot. 4. The motion to file a fourth amended complaint by plaintiffs (doc. 144) is GRANTED. 5. The fourth amended complaint filed by plaintiffs (doc. 146) is DISMISSED sua sponte for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 6. Said dismissals are with prejudice as to Counts I, II, V. VI, VII, and without prejudice as to Counts III, IV, VIII, and IX. 7. In light of the foregoing, plaintiffs' motion for joinder (doc. 147) is DENIED as moot. 8. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of March, 2011. s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:09cv321/MCR/MD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?