THOMPSON v. NOVOTNY

Filing 16

ORDER - Adopting 10 Report and Recommendation. - The complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by res judicata. - All pending motions are DENIED as moot. - This action is DISMISSED and the clerk is directed to close the file. - - - Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on December 16, 2009. (cbj)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION EDW ARD L. THOMPSON, SR., Plaintiff, vs. SUSAN M. NOVOTNY, ROGER VINSON, and M. CASEY RODGERS, Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 30, 2009 (Doc. 10). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections (Doc. 12). Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and Case No. 3:09cv385/LAC/EMT incorporated by reference in this order. 2. 3. 4. The complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by res judicata. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. This action is DISMISSED and the clerk is directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of December, 2009. s /L .A . Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?