ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL

Filing 93

ORDER - GRANTED, the parties' 92 Joint MOTION for Revision of the Case Scheduling Order. - - The 21 Final Scheduling Order, which incorporated the parties' 20 Joint Report, is amended as outlined (see order image). - - Close of Non-Expert Fact Discovery 3/31/2011; All Discovery to be completed by 10/14/2011. - (Dispositive Motions to be filed by 12/16/2011. Mediation to take place by 1/20/2012. ) - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on September 13, 2010. (cbj)

Download PDF
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL Doc. 93 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ ORDER Before the court is the parties' Joint Motion for Revision of the Case Scheduling Order (Doc. 92). Upon consideration, the court concludes that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: The parties' joint motion (Doc. 92) is GRANTED. The Final Scheduling Order (Doc. 21), which incorporated the parties' Joint Report (Doc. 20), is amended to reflect the following deadlines: March 31, 2011 May 20, 2011 July 1, 2011 July 22, 2011 October 14, 2011 December 16, 2011 January 20, 2012 Close of Non-Expert Fact Discovery Plaintiff's expert disclosures and reports due Defendants' expert disclosures and reports due Plaintiff's rebuttal expert disclosures and reports due Deadline for completion of all discovery Deadline for filing of dispositive motions Deadline to complete mediation Case No. 3:09cv395/RV/EMT In all other respects, the Final Scheduling Order remains in effect. DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of September 2010. /s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?