BETHEL v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA

Filing 14

ORDER. Plaintiffs' objection 11 , construed as a motion to reconsider the court's September 30, 2009, order 7 requiring them to file an amended complaint on the appropriate, court-approved form, is DENIED. If Plaintif fs wish to pursue this matter, they must comply with the instructions previously provided by the court. Plaintiffs' failure to file an amended complaint as instructed may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to co mply with a court order. Plaintiffs are advised they may obtain review of an order of this court on any pretrial matter by filing a motion for reconsideration with the district court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), in which they must show that this court's order was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 10/15/09. (lcu)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION ORLANDO BETHEL and GLYNIS BETHEL VS ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA, et al REFERRAL AND ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Timothy on October 14, 2009 Type of Motion/Pleading: RESPONSE (TITLED OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE'S ORDER DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 DENYING AND REFUSING THE FORM OF PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL RULE 5(d)(4)) Filed by: Plaintiffs on 10/13/09 Document 11 Case No. 3:09cv432/RV/EMT

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT /s/ Teresa Milstead Deputy Clerk: Teresa Milstead ORDER Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 15th day of October, 2009, that: Plaintiffs' objection, construed as a motion to reconsider the court's September 30, 2009, order (Doc. 7) requiring them to file an amended complaint on the appropriate, court-approved form, is DENIED. If Plaintiffs wish to pursue this matter, they must comply with the instructions previously provided by the court. Plaintiffs' failure to file an amended complaint as instructed may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order. Plaintiffs are advised they may obtain review of an order of this court on any pretrial matter by filing a motion for reconsideration with the district court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), in which they must show that this court's order was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. /s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE