SCHLOSSER v. MCNEIL

Filing 36

ORDER adopting 34 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED for the failure to state a claim for relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on May 18, 2012. (pmc)

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
GAETINO J. SCHLOSSER,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No.: 3:09cv500/MCR/EMT

WALTER A. McNEIL, et al.,
Defendants.
_________________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated April 17, 2012 (doc. 34). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of
the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.
The court has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation, and the
record, and determines that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.

The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.
2.

This action is DISMISSED for the failure to state a claim for relief, pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).
DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2012.

M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE