PENSACOLA MOTOR SALES INC v. EASTERN SHORE TOYOTA LLC et al

Filing 76

ORDER denying 74 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 7/29/2010. (jcw)

PENSACOLA MOTOR SALES INC v. EASTERN SHORE TOYOTA LLC et al

Doc. 76

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

PENSACOLA MOTOR SALES, a Florida corporation, d/b/a BOB TYLER TOYOTA, Plaintiff, vs. EASTERN SHORE TOYOTA, LLC, an Alabama Limited Liability Company; DAPHNE AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, an Alabama Limited Liability Company; SHAW N ESFAHANI, Individually; and DAPHNE ENTERPRISES, INC., an Alabama corporation, Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER Before me is Plaintiff's Objection To The Report And Recommendation Denying Plaintiff's Motion To Compel, Or In The Alternative Motion For Reconsideration Of the Order (Doc. 74). Plaintiff's counsel incorrectly cites the de novo standard of review of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B&C). The referral to the Magistrate Judge was in fact pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A). IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection To The Report And Recommendation Denying Plaintiff's Motion To Compel, Or In The Alternative Motion For Reconsideration Of the Order (Doc. 74) is denied because it has not been shown that the Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc. 73) is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. CASE NO. 3:09cv571/RS-MD

Dockets.Justia.com

ORDERED on July 29, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak RICHARD SMOAK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE