ROYSTER v. MORGAN

Filing 47

ORDER Adopting 42 Report and Recommendation. This action is Dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on March 22, 2011. (tl)

-EMT ROYSTER v. MORGAN et al

Doc. 47

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION ROBERT EARL ROYSTER, Plaintiff, vs. SHERIFF DAVID MORGAN, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 2, 2011 (Doc. 42). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of March, 2011. Case No. 3:10cv31/LAC/EMT

s /L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com