STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al

Filing 8

(Deficiency) ORDER - 1) The document shall remain in the electronic file, but the Court will not consider it until you have corrected the deficiencies through the filing of a corrected document. The document is Denied without prejudice, with leave given to refile after correction. 2) The submitted hard copy of the document shall be returned to you by the Clerk without electronic filing. It may be resubmitted after the deficiencies are corrected. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE ROGER VINSON on 4/5/2010. (laj)

Download PDF
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION STATE OF FLORIDA, et al vs UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al Case No. 3:10cv91/RV/EMT ORDER TO: Paul Andrew Mitchell Your document, NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPLY FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE (received 3/31/10), was referred to the undersigned with the following deficiencies: (a) (b) The document does not have an original signature or proper electronic signature. The first page of the document does not have a bottom margin of at least two inches as required by N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.1(B)(3). Any intervention in this case must be on grounds, and in accordance with the procedures, set out in Rule 24, Federal Rules of Civil Procdure. (c) For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The document shall remain in the electronic file, but the court will not consider it until you have corrected the above deficiencies through the filing of a corrected document. The document is DENIED without prejudice, with leave given to refile after correction. The submitted hard copy of the document shall be returned to you by the Clerk without electronic filing. It may be resubmitted after the above noted deficiencies are corrected. (2) DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of April, 2010. /s Roger Vinson ROGER VINSON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?