SEARCY v. PEARSON
Filing
9
ORDER re 8 Amended Complaint filed by STEPHEN PAUL SEARCY - - Within twenty-one (21) days from order date, pla shall submit two identical copies of his amended complaint. - - (Service Copies due by 6/11/2010. )- - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on May 21, 2010. (cbj)
<![CDATA[
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
STEPHEN PAUL SEARCY, #9601103437 Plaintiff, vs. DEPUTY PEARSON #380 and DEPUTY FLANIGAN #26,. Defendants. 3:10cv113/LAC/MD
ORDER This case is before the court upon plaintiff's amended complaint. Upon review of the plaintiff's allegations, it appears that service of this complaint is now appropriate. Because plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, he is not responsible for the costs of service.1 However, before service can be ordered, he must submit two service copies of his amended complaint that are identical to each other and to the amended complaint filed with the court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit two identical copies of his amended complaint for service on the defendants. 2. Failure to timely comply with this order may result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action.
1P l a i n t if f is reminded of his continued obligation to subm it m on thly insta llm en t paym en ts to the court until the
filing fee is paid in fu ll.
Page 2 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of May, 2010.
/s/
Miles Davis
MILES DAVIS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case No: 3:10cv113/LAC/MD
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
