PROCTOR v. COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al

Filing 63

ORDER Plas claims against Defendant Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. &BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP are dismissed with prejudice. Dft Countrywide Home Loans, Incs Counterclaim against Pla is dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their respective costs and attorneys fees. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 12/27/2010. (sea)

Download PDF
-MD PROCTOR v. COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al Doc. 63 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION FRED C. PROCTOR, JR., Plaintiff, vs. COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., a New York corporation; BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, a Texas Limited Partnership; LARRY WRIGHT, Individually; WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES OF NORTHW EST FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation; CHRISTOPHER LEE PEAVY, Individually; JAMES A. PEAVY, JR., Individually; ANDREW PICKEL, Individually; and PEAVY AND ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation, Defendants. _______________________________________ COUNTRYW IDE HOME LOANS, INC., a New York corporation, Counter-Plaintiff, vs. FRED C. PROCTOR, JR., Counter-Defendant. _______________________________________/ CASE NO. 3:10cv149/RS-MD ORDER Before me is Countrywide's, BAC's, and Fred C. Proctor, Jr.'s Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and Joint Motion To Amend Order Of Dismissal (Doc. 62). This Order amends the Order (Doc. 55). Dockets.Justia.com IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP are dismissed with prejudice. 2. Defendant Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.'s Counterclaim against Plaintiff is dismissed with prejudice. 3. The parties shall bear their respective costs and attorney's fees. ORDERED on December 17, 2010. /S/ Richard Smoak RICHARD SMOAK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?