BISHOP v. MCNEIL
ORDER re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by SCOTT J BISHOP - - 1. Clerk shall forward to petitioner a form application for leave to proceed IFP, with this case number written on it. - 2. Within twenty-eight (28) days o f order date, petitioner shall either pay the $5.00 filing fee, or submit a complete IFP application. - - (Habeas Filing Fee due by 8/10/2010 ; Alternatively, IFP Motion due by 8/10/2010. ) - - - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on July 13, 2010.- (form to petitioner) (cbj)
BISHOP v. MCNEIL
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION SCOTT J. BISHOP, Petitioner, vs. W ALTER A. MCNEIL, Respondent. CASE NO.: 3:10cv234/RV/MD
ORDER Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1). Petitioner has neither paid the $5.00 filing fee nor applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner's case cannot proceed until he either pays the filing fee or files a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. A complete application includes a motion with supporting affidavit, a prisoner consent form and a financial certificate with account attachments (a printout of the transactions in petitioner's inmate trust account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his petition). Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Clerk shall forward to the petitioner a form application for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis. This case number shall be written on the form. 2. W ithin twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this order, petitioner shall either
pay the $5.00 filing fee in full, or submit a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of July, 2010. /s/
MILES DAVIS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?