MARTS v. MCNEIL
ORDER adopting 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Respondent's 37 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The 10 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice to Petitioner's filing a second amended petition. This matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for issuance of an order directing Petitioner to file a second amended petition. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on June 1, 2011. (pmc)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 3:10cv240/LAC/EMT
EDWIN G. BUSS,
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated May 20, 2011 (Doc. 42). The parties have been furnished a copy of the
Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to
Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto,
I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by
reference in this order.
Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 37) is GRANTED on the ground that the
amended petition fails to properly present grounds demonstrating a basis for habeas relief.
The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 10) is DISMISSED without
prejudice to Petitioner’s filing a second amended petition.
This matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for issuance of an order
directing Petitioner to file a second amended petition.
Petitioner is instructed not to file a second amended petition until directed to do so
Page 2 of 2
by the assigned magistrate judge.
DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of June, 2011.
s /L.A. Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:10cv240/LAC/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?