MARTS v. MCNEIL

Filing 79

ORDER adopting 73 Report and Recommendation. The second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 47 ) is DENIED. Petitioner's "Motion for Evidentiary Hearing w/ Motion for Judgment [sic] on Pleadings" (doc. 71 ) is DENIED. The Motion for Certificate of Appealability (doc. 76 ) is DENIED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on May 17, 2012. (pmc)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION SIDNEY MARTS, Petitioner, vs. Case No. 3:10cv240/LAC/EMT KENNETH S. TUCKER, Respondent. ___________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated April 16, 2012 (doc. 73). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 47) is DENIED. 3. Petitioner’s “Motion for Evidentiary Hearing w/ Motion for Judgment [sic] on Pleadings” (doc. 71) is DENIED. Page 2 of 2 4. The Motion for Certificate of Appealability (doc. 76) is DENIED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2012. s /L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:06cv2/LAC/EMT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?