TAYLOR v. MORGAN
Filing
31
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; adopting 27 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 7/29/2011. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
WILLIAM N. TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:10cv338/MCR/EMT
DAVID MORGAN, et al.
Defendants.
_________________________________/
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated June 16, 2011 (Doc. 27). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of
the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been
filed.1
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, the court has
determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
1
This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply
On July 6, 2011, Plaintiff filed a m otion seeking leave to file an am ended com plaint and stating he
would m ake arrangem ents to pay $100 towards the filing fee by July 8, 2011 (doc. 28). The court granted this
m otion and the order was m ailed to Plaintiff but was returned as undeliverable. The court has attem pted to
locate another address for the Plaintiff without success; the Escam bia County Jail records indicate he has
been released and his address is listed as hom eless. No paym ent has been received since the filing of that
m otion and no am ended com plaint has been filed.
Page 2 of 2
with an order of the court.
DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of July, 2011.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:10cv338/MCR/EMT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?