PEARSON v. WILLIAMS

Filing 22

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; adopting 20 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED for the failure to state a claim for relief and for seeking monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 3/28/2011. (djb)

-EMT PEARSON v. WILLIAMS

Doc. 22

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION SAM J. PEARSON, IV, Plaintiff, vs. JOYCE H. WILLIAMS, Defendant. ____________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 16, 2011 (Doc. 20). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and Case No. 3:10cv348/MCR/EMT

incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This action is DISMISSED for the failure to state a claim for relief and for

seeking monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of March, 2011.

s/

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com