BRAND v. INMATE PHONE SERVICE
ORDER adopting 17 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Pla's failure to comply with an order of the court. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on February 25, 2011. (kvg)
-EMT BRAND v. INMATE PHONE SERVICE
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
QUAR'MARDEN QUAR'NAIN BRAND, Plaintiff, v. INMATE PHONE SERVICE, et al., Defendants. / ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 21, 2011. (Doc. 17). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and Case No.: 3:10cv415/MCR/EMT
incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply
with an order of the court. DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2011.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?