BRAND v. INMATE PHONE SERVICE

Filing 19

ORDER adopting 17 Report and Recommendation. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Pla's failure to comply with an order of the court. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on February 25, 2011. (kvg)

-EMT BRAND v. INMATE PHONE SERVICE

Doc. 19

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

QUAR'MARDEN QUAR'NAIN BRAND, Plaintiff, v. INMATE PHONE SERVICE, et al., Defendants. / ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 21, 2011. (Doc. 17). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and Case No.: 3:10cv415/MCR/EMT

incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply

with an order of the court. DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2011.

s/

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com