ANDERSON v. MORGAN
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendant Hemphill's motion to dismiss (doc. 44 ) is GRANTED. Defendant Little's motion to dismiss (doc. 54 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/16/2013. (sdw)
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ANTHONY MACK ANDERSON,
Case No.: 3:10cv459/MCR/CJK
A. HEMPHILL, et al.,
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated August 28, 2013 (doc. 58). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy
of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections
pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo
determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto
timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
Defendant Hemphill’s motion to dismiss (doc. 44) is GRANTED.
Defendant Little’s motion to dismiss (doc. 54) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
The clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of September, 2013.
M. Casey Rodgers
M. CASEY RODGERS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?