MORRIS v. CASTOR

Filing 12

ORDER Adopting 8 Report and Recommendation. This action is Dismissed with prejudice on Rooker-Feldman and Younger abstention grounds. All pending motions are Denied as moot. Final judgment shall be entered accordingly, and the clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on March 28, 2011. (tl)

Download PDF
-EMT MORRIS v. CASTOR Doc. 12 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION CHARLES LITTON MORRIS, Plaintiff, vs. SUSAN STOKES CASTOR, Defendant. _________________________________/ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 24, 2011 (Doc. 8). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and Case No.: 3:11cv1/MCR/EMT incorporated by reference in this order. 2. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice on Rooker-Feldman and Younger abstention grounds. 3. 4. the file. DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of March, 2011. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. Final judgment shall be entered accordingly, and the clerk is directed to close s/ M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?