GAFFORD v. BUSS
Filing
32
ORDER adopting 26 Report and Recommendation. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 8 ), challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Johnny Bryant Gafford in the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County, Florida, Case No. 05-CF-1311 is DENIED, and the clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on May 17, 2013. (pmc)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
JOHNNY BRYANT GAFFORD,
Petitioner,
vs.
Case No. 3:11cv227/LAC/CJK
MICHAEL D. CREWS,
Respondent.
________________________________________________________________
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated March 6, 2013. (Doc. 26). The parties have been furnished
a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to
file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have
made a de novo determination of the objections filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed
objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be
adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 8), challenging the
judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Johnny Bryant Gafford in
the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County, Florida, Case No. 05-CF-1311 is DENIED,
and the clerk is directed to close the file.
Page 2 of 2
3.
A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2013.
s /L.A.
Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:11cv227/LAC/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?