LEWIS v. BUSS

Filing 30

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 24 Report and Recommendation. The 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, challenging the judgment of conviction and sentences in State of Florida v. David Gene Lewis in the Circuit Court for Walton County, Florida, Case No. 06-CF-479 is DENIED, and the clerk is directed to close the file. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 4/2/2013. (djb)

Download PDF
Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION DAVID GENE LEWIS, Petitioner, vs. Case No. 3:11cv260/LAC/CJK MICHAEL D. CREWS, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________ ORDER This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated January 16, 2013. (Doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging the judgment of conviction and sentences in State of Florida v. David Gene Lewis in the Circuit Court for Walton County, Florida, Case No. 06-CF-479 is DENIED, and the clerk is directed to close the file. Page 2 of 2 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of April, 2013. s /L.A. Collier LACEY A. COLLIER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No: 3:11cv260LAC/CJK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?