OWEN v. SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Filing
43
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 42 Report and Recommendation. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 32 ), challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Charles Ellis Owen in the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County, Florida, Case No. 07-CF-2561 is DENIED, and the clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 2/11/2013. (djb)
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
CHARLES ELLIS OWEN,
Petitioner,
vs.
Case No. 3:11cv350/LAC/CJK
SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent.
________________________________________________________________
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation dated January 8, 2013. (Doc. 42). The parties have been furnished
a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to
file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No
objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the
Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1.
The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this order.
2.
The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 32), challenging
the judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Charles Ellis Owen in
the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County, Florida, Case No. 07-CF-2561 is DENIED,
and the clerk is directed to close the file.
Page 2 of 2
3.
A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of February, 2013.
s /L.A.
Collier
LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case No: 3:11cv350LAC/CJK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?